Saint Louis Beacon

Tuesday
Jul 08th
           | 
Home arrow Voices arrow Obama's riding that illusory horse named momentum
Obama's riding that illusory horse named momentum Print E-mail
By M.W. Guzy, Special to the Beacon   
Last Updated ( Friday, 23 May 2008 )
 

Political campaigns are often likened to horse races. If you saw this year's Kentucky Derby, you'll understand why. That contest offered the perfect metaphor for the Democratic presidential primary in that the only female running wound up dead in second place, while Big Brown cruised to victory.

As the interminable Barack & Hillary slugfest staggers into its 16th month, the common wisdom has it that momentum has shifted from "Momma" back to Obama. Hillary supposedly stole Barack's earlier mo with a 10-point win in Pennsylvania last month. That, combined with her wins in other populous states, advanced her campaign's argument that she was the only electable Democrat left in the race -- an interesting claim from the candidate with the highest polling negatives in modern history.

At the outset, the freshman senator from Illinois was a decided dark horse to the better-known former First Lady. He first grabbed the momentum with a surprise win in Iowa, lost it in New Hampshire then took it back on Super Tuesday. Since then, it's been Hillary slogging her way down the campaign trail, doggedly fighting to re-establish her viability as a candidate. With a considerable assist from Obama's former spiritual adviser, she managed to do just that in Pennsylvania.

Now, legend has it, Obama has re-captured the lightening with a 14-point victory in North Carolina; a near landslide that Hillary's 2-point nail-biter in Indiana was insufficient to offset. Barack in the saddle again, he's now the consensus favorite thanks to the latest shift in momentum.

Marshall Ramsey

 20080428rs1aw-hillaryvote.jpg

The Clarion Ledger, Jackson, Miss.

If we understand momentum to entail a shift of support from one candidate to another, a look inside the numbers serves to dispel the notion that any such thing is taking place. In North Carolina, where she lost badly, Clinton took 60 precent of the white vote and Obama claimed about 90 precent of the black vote. In Indiana, where she won narrowly, Clinton gained 61 precent of the white vote while Obama garnered just over 90 precent of the black. Pennsylvania? Clinton = 60 precent of the white; Obama = 92 precent of the black vote.

It seems that the party that complains about gridlock in Washington is itself gridlocked. The internal metrics of this so-called race are frozen. The outcomes of the various primaries are determined not by campaign dynamics but by the pre-existing demographics in a given state.

It appears that race trumps sex as a predictor of voter behavior. Hillary takes the white male vote; Barack carries black females. With Latinos tracking 2 to 1 in her favor, the formula for a Clinton triumph at the polls -- as opposed to caucuses -- basically looks like this:

60 percent of the white vote + 10 percent of the black vote + 67 percent of the Latino vote = 50+ precent of the total 

Ironically, Obama was supposed to be the candidate who transcended the balkanized divisions of identity politics. In the early going, he seemed able to do so. However, as the field narrowed to the final two contenders, support for each has crystallized. The newly unveiled "shot-and-a-beer Hillary" carries the blue-collar vote. Besides African-Americans, Barack appeals to youthful voters and better-educated white liberals: the same winning combination that worked so well for McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis.

Exit polls in North Carolina and Indiana indicate that fewer than half of Clinton voters said they'd be willing to support Obama if he were the ultimate nominee. If that trend continues, it's exceedingly bad news for Democrats. Much of Barack's insurmountable lead comes from his electoral sweep of the Deep South and caucus wins in places like Wyoming and Iowa. He'll have difficulty carrying many of these states in the general election.

As of this writing, Clinton won West Virginia handily, primaries are pending in Kentucky and Oregon. West Virginia has voted for the winner in 5 of the last 7 presidential elections; Kentucky is 7-0 over the same period. Hillary won West Virginia and is favored in Kentucky. Oregon, which Obama is expected to win, has gone with the winner 3 times in that span.

Of course, in politics, perception tends to become reality. If enough people are convinced that you're the inevitable nominee, it becomes inevitable that you'll be nominated. Absent calamity, Barack Obama will ride the illusion of momentum to the finish line.

This race may be over, but it was just the preliminary heat. In the main event, the old war horse, McCain, looks like an early favorite...


   

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

 

Display 3 of 3 comments

or maybe...

By: flyover0909 (Registered ) on 22-05-2008 17:19

Maybe he is just using horse racing as a metaphor because this is the season of horse racing's triple crown. In the law, there is a doctrine called "innocent construction" it means if there is a version of a statement that can be construed innocently, it has to be a defense. I think that applies here. at least he didn't call Hillary an old nag.

 

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

Sad

By: teacherguy (Registered ) on 19-05-2008 16:29

Sad that some can find racial overtones in almost everything, sad that liberals continue to be so whiny, sad that the Dems are going to continue to self-implode due in large part to their former First Lady's ego. 
Their uncivil civil warring can only play to the advantage for the GOP.

 

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

Special Right Wing Comment apparently

By: StlProgress (Registered ) on 16-05-2008 19:07

This "commentary" is merely a poorly disguised smear of Obama and of Democrats. And a bit sloppy at that. Calling Barack Obama the "dark horse"? Any self-aware writer would have nixed that as a foot-in-mouth metaphor. The argument about momentum is proposed as the current "common wisdom," but as proof that the momentum isn't building, the writer cites past polling stats. You have to use more current stats as support if you're going to rely on them as evidence. Some of this is just cherry picked anyway. Since 1904, Missouri has always voted for the winner of the presidential election with one exception. Obama won the state, therefore Obama has a better chance of winning in the general election. See how easy that was?  
In the end, the real agenda of this piece is carelessly revealed in the final line.

 

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

Display 3 of 3 comments



Add your comment
Only registered users can comment on an article. Please login or register.


mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved

Editors' Picks

 

Facing Foreclosure: Granite City

 

mortgageicon.jpg From KETC, Living St. Louis Producer Patrick Murphy visits Granite City, Illinois, a community hard hit by the mortgage crisis—with as many as 120 foreclosure cases each month. Illinois has a judicial foreclosure system that gives you more time before losing your home. The foreclosure begins with a lawsuit and has to be approved by a judge which can take as long as a year. If you're facing a mortgage crisis, the most important thing to do is to ask your lender questions and seek help.

See more coverage: Facing the Mortgage Crisis

Voices in the news

  • Civic Progress served the region well, but changes in the corporate and banking world created a need for a new leaders. The obvious place to look is to the higher education system, writes lawyer John Roach.

Columnists

  • kerry100.jpgColumnist M.W. Guzy looks at an overview of the 2004 election and wonders how John Kerry lost. Exit polls, which are usually much more precise than pre-election polling, showed Kerry with a decent margin of victory in several states. But that margin evaporated when the vote totals were released.

Blogs

  • Law Scoop

    The U.S. Senate is on the verge of passing a new foreign intelligence surveillance law that U.S. Sen. Christopher S. "Kit" Bond, R-Mo., has described as "a better deal than they even (the White House) had hoped to get." The ACLU calls it "Christmas" at the White House and Barack Obama's social networkers are up in arms.

The Lens


mortgageicon.jpg

The Beacon and KETC/Channel 9 are covering mortgage forclosures – how they're affecting St. Louis area residents and where you can find help. 

Visit our special section to read coverage of this issue, watch Channel 9's stories and access resources to find help.

heliumplusbeacon200sq.jpg

The Beacon, through Helium.com, invites writers to respond to questions we pose on timely topics. Winning articles appear in the Beacon. 

To see the latest winner, read "Does it matter if your brew is American-made?".

Our next topic: How should flood plain development be handled? For details, visit Helium.

facebook2.jpg

Join the folks who have already found the Beacon on Facebook, the social networking site. See the most popular stories of the day, photos, videos and upcoming events. Visit the St. Louis Beacon page on Facebook and become a fan.

pulitzerheader.jpg

The Beacon features links to the latest work by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.This Washington-based non-profit organization promotes in-depth international coverage of topics that have been under-reported, mis-reported - or not reported at all.

To see a list on our World news page, click here . The Pulitzer Center's founder is Jon Sawyer, former Washington Bureau chief of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

rss75.gif

What's this icon? It's the standard icon for RSS.

RSS gives you another option for reading the Beacon, in a way that may be more convenient for you. As explained below, you can use our RSS feed to get alerts about new Beacon content. The Beacon's main RSS feed is here.

For more about RSS, read this quick introduction or watch this video: RSS in simple English.