St. Louis Beacon

  • Meredith Backs The Beacon
Thursday
Feb 09th






      
 
Home

Cialis Online

China's now No. 2. So what? Print E-mail
By R.W. Hafer, Special to the Beacon   
Posted 6:43 am Fri., 8.20.10

The news that China has surpassed Japan as the world's second largest economy sent a shiver through the collective soul of economic pundits. It needn't have.

During the late 1980s, we were warned of Japan's expanding economic machine. The Japanese economy was then expanding at a rate that made ours look puny. Everyone looked to Japan as the source for economic inspiration and guidance: Recall the movement to adopt their management techniques or face economic defeat?

Flash forward to the present. Japan's economic malaise over the past two decades is well-documented. Not adopting Japanese management techniques and broad government policies appears to have been the wise thing to do. While the U.S. economy expanded during the 1990s at a pace not seen in the modern post-war era, Japan's economy foundered and sank. Even today Japan's policy-makers seem unable to right their economic ship.

With Japan no longer the threatening up-and-comer, we needed to find a replacement. China more than fits that bill for those hell-bent to find another economy that will overtake ours. Like Chicken Little, they spread a false fear.

Consider the facts. Right now GDP (gross domestic product) in the United States, a measure of the economy's output, is roughly $14 trillion. This isn't necessarily the best measure to use -- GDP combines both changes in prices and changes in the amount of goods and services produced in the economy -- but it is the one everybody has focused on, so we'll use it, too.

How big is No. 2 China? Try $1.3 trillion. No, that's not a typo: China's economy, No. 2 in the world, is only about one-tenth the size of the U.S. economy. Why the angst? (Note: A comment pointed out that the $1.33 trillion figure is only for the second quarter of this year, not the annualized value. On an properly annualized basis, the Chinese economy is about one-third, not one-tenth the size of the U.S. economy. And, if it continued to grow at a 10 percent rate and the U.S. expanded at 3 percent, China's economy would catch up to the U.S. economy in less time than the 35 years I erroneously stated. Even with those corrections, at best it would take several decades. However, I continue to maintain that the conditions for such double-digit Chinese growth to continue are unlikely to exist over the next few decades. For the reasons I suggested, and there are other potential causes, China's growth rate will slow, thus pushing off the possible time when it would surpass the United States. Of course, if one uses GDP per person as the basis for comparison, a much more widely accepted measure of economic success and well-being than sheer size of the economy, China remains one of the poorest countries in the world. On the basis of that measure, the average citizen enjoys only small fraction of China's aggregate income compared with citizens in the other major economies. — R.W. Hafer)

One reason is the misuse of mathematics to feed the fear-mongering. As a recent New York Times article reads, "Forecasts that China will be No. 1 as early as 2030." This statement is true, but for highly improbable reasons.

Could China surpass the U.S.? It is all based on the assumptions used to make the calculations. If China's economy continues to expand at a 10 percent rate (assuming those official statistics are correct) and if the U.S. economy grows at its long-term trend of 3 percent, then yes, it would take about 35 years for the Chinese economy to equal the size of the U.S. economy. That is just simple algebra -- and it is a big if.

Two key factors will prevent this outcome, however. First, no modern economy has expanded at such a double-digit rate for such an extended period of time. Economic history shows us that developed economies tend to settle in at long-term growth rates around 3 percent. This is true for all of the European economies, for Canada and for the U.S. It also will be true for China. Once it achieves economic maturity, it will see slower economic growth.

Second, the increase in China's economic well-being will promote change. We are seeing the beginnings of such social change in the increased unrest among Chinese laborers over working conditions and compensation. We are seeing evidence of a housing bubble emerging in some fast-expanding urban areas.

Ask anybody who has visited China recently and a common observation is the level of pollution. As incomes rise, Chinese citizens will demand cleaner air and water. This will lead to more regulation of production, reducing productivity and output growth.

There is no denying that China is taking its place among the economic superpowers. But to suggest it will overtake the U.S.economically is at best premature and unfounded by reasonable facts.

rik100hafer.jpgR.W. Hafer is the distinguished research professor and chair in the Department of Economics and Finance at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville and a research fellow at the Show-Me Institute. To reach him, contact Beacon features and commentary editor Donna Korando.

 

 

 

Comments  

 
#1 hanyu choi 2010-08-20 08:11
I can not believe this ignorant man is a profesor in a college. The China's GDP figure(1.3 trillion dollars) is only for the quater of April-June 2010. So if you want to come up with China's GDP for the entire year of 2010, then you have to multiply 1.3 trillion dollars by 4, therefore total GDP figure of China for the entire year will be 5.2 trillion dollars, not 1.3 trillion dollars. But if you add a 10% growth and about 2.5% yuan appreciation, China's GDP at the end of this year will be around 5.6 trillion dollars. By the way, last year's Chinese GDP was about 5 trillion dollars. As you can see China's GDP right now is more than 1/3 of American GDP( 14 trillion dollars). If America grows 2-3% a year for the next 10 years and China grows 8-10% a year and yuan also appreciate 2-5% a year for the same time period, China wll overtake America by 2020. These are very reasonable assumptions. PROFESSOR, I want a reply from you.
 
 
#2 Donna Korando, Features and commentary editor 2010-08-20 12:54
Mea culpa. You are quite correct that the $1.33 trillion figure reported in my article is only for the second quarter of this year, not the annualized value. On an properly annualized basis, the Chinese economy is about one-third, not one-tenth the size of the U.S. economy. And, if it continued to grow at a 10 percent rate and the U.S. expanded at 3 percent, China's economy would catch up to the U.S. economy in less time than the 35 years I erroneously stated. Even with those corrections, at best it would take several decades. However, I continue to maintain that the conditions for such double-digit Chinese growth to continue are unlikely to exist over the next few decades. For the reasons I suggested, and there are other potential causes, China's growth rate will slow, thus pushing off the possible time when it would surpass the United States. Of course, if one uses GDP per person as the basis for comparison, a much more widely accepted measure of economic success and well-being than sheer size of the economy, China remains one of the poorest countries in the world. On the basis of that measure, the average citizen enjoys only small fraction of China's aggregate income compared with citizens in the other major economies. -- R,W, Hafer
 
 
#3 hanyu choi 2010-08-20 15:40
To professor: Your math is still wrong. Now you know that China's GDP is about 5.2 trillion dollars which is 4 times greater than 1.3 trillon dollars you mistakenly assumed, then don't you think you should divide 35 years by 4? If you do that , you come up with about 9 years not 35 years. According to you, even with the corrceted figure(5.2 trillion dollars) it will still take "several decades" before China overtakes America.By your own calculation it should be 9 years not"several decades" Am I correct? Unlike Japan in the 90s, China is still a developing country, has a lot of room to grow. The urbanization rate is only 48% and the central and western regions where most Chinese live, are yet fully to be developed. Dr. Fan Gang, a PBOC advisor believes that CHINA can grow 9% a year for the next 30 years.The World Bank also predicted 2020 for China overtaking America. By 2040 China will be on a parity with Amerca in per capita income.
 
 
#4 Am Am 2010-08-22 01:07
China's GDP is simply lied number..I never believe in China goverment' s economic report...They are faking everything for political purposes. In my professional opinion, China even haven't yet passed Germany in economy and no way, no how for china being able to overtake Japan in furture. China is only good at making poor quality and cheap goods and their this advantage may not last long meanwhile China is still so bad at making creative goods and service and there is no sign of china improving its creative power.
 
 
#5 Am Am 2010-08-22 01:08
China's real GDP is simply result of inhumanly excessive exploitation labour of immigrant poor workers from rural to make goods for export and it is kept in Usd. As you know, Worker's income in china is so low that many workers can not do anything with their salary but buying food for survival. I live in Viet Nam and know that a lot regions in China now remain poorer than the poorest region of Viet Nam, gap between the rich and the poor in China is terribly large and it is larger and larger ..I also know that even there are some poor Chinese not taking a bath for months because of shortage of water, My friends in Gu?ngd?ng Province told me that a lots household in rural even don't afford a toilet to sht...In my opinion China is still basically the very poor country
 
 
#6 hanyu choi 2010-08-22 04:49
To Am Am: From the TIME magazine to the ECONOMIST it is confirmed that the China's GDP is real. Then who the f--k are you questioning their judgements? During the 19th and the early 20th centuries when AMERICA was still a developing country, she was as bad as China when it came to degradation of environment and exploitation of cheap labor. Also America was very good at making cheap European knockoffs, and dangerous food items. There is a good article in the August 26,2007 BOSTON GLOBE, titled A NATION OF OUTLAWS A CENTURY AGO, THAT WASN'T CHINA---- IT WAS US. If you read the article you will find out how bad America was in creativity,inno vation, food sanitation. According to the GINI INDEX, the wealth gap in America is almost as bad as it is in China.
 
 
#7 hanyu choi 2010-08-22 05:23
To Am Am: If this is your "professional opinion" I feel very sorry for the unfortunate Vietnamese who have to put up with your " wealth of knowledge" They should kick you out of the country for making people brain-dead.
 
 
#8 Am Am 2010-08-22 14:03
Hi hanyu choi

I have traveled China a lots time and I have a lots chinese friends so I have learned well about china economy....I have come to conclusion that Who Believes China?s ?Bernie Madoff? Data? Just Idiots.

What i say is absolutely true chinese should come back reality and stop dreaming...I have come china a lots times and find that your country basically is backward...Your country just specialize in making faked,toxic, Coppied products...even your country is not capable of making vehicle engine by itself, China cann't make hightech products independently....Viet Nam should not learn anything from china but learn from Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore
 
 
#9 Am Am 2010-08-22 14:11
Nobobdy are qualified to confirm China's GDP because it is absolutely manipulated by China communism dictator regime ...I have heard a lot about China trick to fake economy data report from Mao Tse Tung rule time...But I believe China GDP around 3000 Billions $ is reasonable, remain smaller Japan, Germany...
Chinese should come back reality and stopping dreaming...China is covering truth of 90% its extremely poor country
 
 
#10 hanyu choi 2010-08-22 15:59
To Am Am: According to the CIA WORLD FACTBOOK, the 2009 GDP estimate for China was 4.814 trillion dollars, eventually it turned out to be 5.01 trillion dollars. I'm very sure the CIA employs at least a few smart people who can analyze the China's economy a little better than you can. I have a suspicion that you are a below- average- looking- loser who could not make it at home either financially or romantically or both, then went to Vietnam to make your sorry self feel better by living among poorer Vietnamese and teaching sub-standard English and also occasionally screwing scrawny Vietnamese women or men. The worst statistics fixing outfits were the American financial ratings companies that manufactured ratings for the securities backed by toxic sub-prime mortgages. By this criminal action they almost broght down the entire world economy in 2008. You just can not trust SOME of the figures comming out of America.
 

Only registered users can comment on an article. Please login or register.

  • Thank you for reading the St. Louis Beacon, a non-profit news organization dedicated to reporting and discussing "news that matters" to the St. Louis region. You can support the Beacon by attending our events, becoming a source in our Public Insight Network or making a donation.

Editors' Picks

 

'The Road Show' improv

Brent Jones | St. Louis Beacon

This Saturday was the debut of a new show by The Improv Shop that will bring out of town improv teams to St. Louis to play for — and with — a local audience. The Road Show brought teams "Everybody Grok" and "Felt" from Chicago.

We talked to Eric Christensen, producer of the Road Show and member of local improv team "Ted Dangerous"; Katie Nunn, member of "Ted Dangerous" and improv coach; and Melanie Penn and Ranjan Khan, members of local teams "Melanj" and "Magic Ratio"; about the St. Louis improv scene and why it's important to welcome teams from other cities to perform here.

See a larger version of the slideshow

Topics

Voices

  • M.W. Guzy takes a sighting of Baton Bob in a Super Bowl crowd to reflect on St. Louis and the Rams.

  • Doug Williams says the proposed consent decree before the U.S. district court here may not  be perfect, but it's the best way to move forward to stop the costs of inadquate waste- and storm-water systems.

  • M.W. Guzy fears his daughters' affection for trash TV might have been genetically inherited, as he finds himself drawn to the anybody-but-Mitt show, playing on a loop on cable "news' channels.

Beacon Roundtable

Beacon Blog

On chess


@

Register to receive our daily email of new content.  If you're already registered, email us at [email protected] with the subject line "subscribe".

Barroom Conversations

The Beacon's nationally recognized Barroom Conversations program on race, class and other issues that divide will be held on Monday, Feb. 13, 2012, at 7:30 PM discussing Education and Class. RSVP on Facebook and invite your friends! We'll pick up where we left off at Six Row Brewing Co., 3690 Forest Park Avenue at Spring. We look forward to seeing you again!

FAcebook
Twitter
Google+
RSS
inn_125x125_white_rounded_square2

The Investigative News Network is a consortium of nonprofit news organizations dedicated to watchdog and public interest reporting.

See our other partners.