St. Louis Beacon

  • Lanny Backs The Beacon
Tuesday
Feb 07th






      
 
Home

Cialis Online

A government role in job creation Print E-mail
By Arthur Lieber, Special to the Beacon   
Posted 11:03 am Mon., 8.9.10

To succeed, small businesses need fertile ground in which to grow as well as protection against predators and unfair competition. Whether we like it or not, government plays the role of “traffic cop” in our economy; ensuring for everyone, including small businesses, that we are headed in the right direction and avoiding calamitous outcomes.

It is fashionable to say that the biggest problem that small businesses face is government interference. But what is one person’s interference is another person’s protection. An analogy would be the back judge in a football game who with a simple handkerchief protects the wide receiver from undue interference by the defensive back. Without referees, we would have mayhem; without the government, capitalism would be Darwinian and there would be only a few strong survivors. The interests of the small entrepreneur and the consumer would be left unprotected.

Small businesses must be viewed as part of the fabric of our entire economy. To provide jobs, they should be viewed in relation to Franklin Roosevelt’s 1944 Second (or Economic) Bill of Rights which include:

  • The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
  • The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
  • The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
  • The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
  • The right of every family to a decent home;
  • The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
  • The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
  • The right to a good education.

In today’s world, government can help small businesses create jobs by removing burdens unrelated to the conduct of their business. Companies spend an inordinate amount of money, time and aggravation administering benefits such as health insurance and pensions. In many other industrialized countries these services are provided by the government. If we had a Medicare-for-all health care program, our employees would be better served and businesses would be free of the hassle of ambiguous fine print. Pensions are another burden on small businesses; they are inherently insecure and unfair; we need instead to expand Social Security. Relieved of these burdens, business costs would go down and products would be more competitive overseas.

Consider America’s business sector to be like a healthy forest. A forest with only tall aged trees runs the risk of atrophy and collapsing. The forest needs a combination of saplings, trees in their prime and mature ones. Our country needs a similar blend of businesses ranging from the very young to the well-established.

The most significant way in which the government can encourage small businesses to hire more people is to put small businesses on the vanguard of providing job opportunities for the 9.5 percent of our population out of work. Thirty years ago Alvin Toffler wrote of the advent of the “Third Wave” or the “Information Age.” The “Second Wave” consisted of manufacturing, a sector of our domestic economy that has markedly shrunk in recent years.

However, “Second Wave” industries may be key components to regenerating our economy. Imagine if incentives were given to entrepreneurs in Missouri to renew an industry that previously was key to our state: manufacturing shoes. These new companies would provide jobs, ones that are conveniently commensurate with the skill levels of many workers. These companies would also re-establish the proper balance between the manufacturing and service sectors of our economy. It is true that stimulating manufacturing in our country will mean higher prices, but given a choice between a full-employment economy or Wal-Mart prices for everyone, I suggest that we put people to work. Not only will they have income; they will have dignity and self-respect; two important intangibles that no one gains from shopping at a discount store.

Ultimately the government will have to be the “employer of last resort” in finding jobs for the 14.5 million Americans out of work. However, whenever possible, we should allocate new job opportunities to start-up businesses. Government contracts are key to helping small businesses create jobs.

The conservative mantra that government is the problem does not tell us what to do when the private sector is incapable of hiring everyone who wants and needs a job. If we see government as a solution and the one sector of our society that has a commitment to the well-being of all citizens, it can play a vital; in fact the central, role in ensuring that jobs are created, in small and large businesses alike.

To read an article by incumbent Rep. Todd Akin, R-Town & Country, click here

Editor's Note: Arthur Lieber has been a donor to the Beacon.

Arthur Lieber, a Democrat, is running for the 2nd district congressional race. To reach Voices authors, contact Beacon features and commentary editor Donna Korando.

 

Comments  

 
#1 Reese Forbes 2010-08-09 15:10
The History of the USA proves that government funding and stimulus has always gotten this nation out of problem times.
And basic research funded by the government has brought more innovation than any private effort.
 
 
#2 Stacy Mergenthal 2010-08-09 15:11
It would seem that you and your opponent, Mr. Akin, agree that health insurance is a costly expense for small business. In stark contrast with your opponent, however, you also provide a simple solution to provide people with health coverage while taking the burden off employers. This is a smart, thoughtful approach; one that considers the big picture.
 
 
#3 Carole Bannes 2010-08-10 10:37
Mr Lieber, do you have a web site? I'd like to contribute!
 
 
#4 Arthur Lieber 2010-08-10 13:37
Carole, thanks so much for asking. The campaign web site is www.lieberforcongress.com. We are not soliciting nor accepting contributions because we feel that the way to keep money from corrupting politics is .... to keep it out. So I'm self-funding a very low-budget campaign, hoping that others will accept my perspective on this. I'm also focusing on trying to "elevate the conversation" (we thank both the Beacon and Mr. Akin for providing this forum). I think that you'll find at the web site that you can sign up to volunteer and engage in a host of activities; I'll be happy to respond more from there.
 
 
#5 raymond burchard 2010-08-11 05:23
While agreeing with Arthur Lieber?s premise, I believe he takes the theoretical or Pollyanna approach to assessment and resolution. His appraisal would be fine if the businesses and/or corporations had a management allegiance to balance. But they don?t, their only allegiance to balance comes in the form of what ever they can do, or who ever they can do to make a profit. This compulsive fixating mindset inverts the adage ?all for one and one for all?, its called contrapositive logic.
 
 
#6 raymond burchard 2010-08-11 05:25
Retirement and healthcare used to be a corporate employment inducement, until the escalating cost because of the pharmaceutical companies and the medical community?s greed cut into others corporate profit. Then the corporations lobbied for legislated assistance to disavow this practice and force the public to bare the financial responsibility themselves, (reverse privatization).
 
 
#7 Arthur Lieber 2010-08-11 15:45
I think that we need to accept the reality that corporations, like people, will operate in their own self-interest. Some even think that altruism is selfishness in disguise. I don't think that we should be surprised when corporations try to "get" as much as they can. But, that makes the role of government all the more important, specifically the federal government, because it is the only entity that presumably represents all of us. Now we all know that in reality it doesn't quite work they way, but I think that we need to try to make it work. At the risk of sounding self-serving, I've chosen not to take contributions because that would seem to be the most logical way to not be bought. If I win, hold me very accountable because power can challenge principles.
 

Only registered users can comment on an article. Please login or register.

  • Thank you for reading the St. Louis Beacon, a non-profit news organization dedicated to reporting and discussing "news that matters" to the St. Louis region. You can support the Beacon by attending our events, becoming a source in our Public Insight Network or making a donation.

Editors' Picks

 

'The Road Show' improv

Brent Jones | St. Louis Beacon

This Saturday was the debut of a new show by The Improv Shop that will bring out of town improv teams to St. Louis to play for — and with — a local audience. The Road Show brought teams "Everybody Grok" and "Felt" from Chicago.

We talked to Eric Christensen, producer of the Road Show and member of local improv team "Ted Dangerous"; Katie Nunn, member of "Ted Dangerous" and improv coach; and Melanie Penn and Ranjan Khan, members of local teams "Melanj" and "Magic Ratio"; about the St. Louis improv scene and why it's important to welcome teams from other cities to perform here.

See a larger version of the slideshow

Topics

Voices

  • M.W. Guzy fears his daughters' affection for trash TV might have been genetically inherited, as he finds himself drawn to the anybody-but-Mitt show, playing on a loop on cable "news' channels.

  • Miguel Dulick recounts a trans-Honduras tour that, again, reminded him of the power and joy of keeping siblings and parents connected.

  • Ken Schechtman says that publicly traded business will not -- perhaps cannot -- put doing the right thing ahead of legally maximizing profits.

Beacon Roundtable

Beacon Blog

On chess


@

Register to receive our daily email of new content.  If you're already registered, email us at [email protected] with the subject line "subscribe".

Barroom Conversations

The Beacon's nationally recognized Barroom Conversations program on race, class and other issues that divide will be held on Monday, Feb. 20, 2012, at 7:30 PM discussing Education and Class. RSVP on Facebook and invite your friends! We'll pick up where we left off at Six Row Brewing Co., 3690 Forest Park Avenue at Spring. We look forward to seeing you again!

mikado

The MIKADO has a little list … were you on it?

The St. Louis Beacon rang in 2012 with a concert performance of Gilbert & Sullivan's beloved operetta, "The Mikado," at the Sheldon Concert Hall, and the Higher Education Channel was on hand to record it. Here is a link to the complete perfomance, which we hope you'll enjoy.

 The musical direction of "The Mikado" was by Amy Kaiser; Craig Terry was conductor-accompanist. All proceeds from ticket sales benefitted the Beacon.
FAcebook
Twitter
Google+
RSS
inn_125x125_white_rounded_square2

The Investigative News Network is a consortium of nonprofit news organizations dedicated to watchdog and public interest reporting.

See our other partners.